This page covers:
(updated 2 May 2024)
This table compares the four tools for their capabilities in generating literature reviews. Learn more from this post: Trust in AI: Evaluating Scite, Elicit, Consensus, and Scopus AI for Generating Literature Reviews
| Scite (Assistant) | Elicit | Consensus (Copilot) | Scopus AI | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Access & Fees | HKUST access (subscribed by library) |
https://elicit.com (5000 free credits, life time) |
https://consensus.app/ (20 credits per month for advanced AI features) |
Currently on trial (till end of Mar 2024) |
| Role in assisting literature review | AI chatbot that can generate literature review with real citations in context | AI research assistant that can generate literature matrix and a review with real citations | AI academic search engine that can generate literature review with real citations | AI feature add-on in Scopus that can generate literature review with real citations from Scopus |
| Data sources for training the models |
|
|
|
|
| Unique features |
|
|
|
|
| No. of references included in the summary | ~10 |
4 (8 for Plus users) Literature matrix can include more articles |
10 | 5-8 |
| Search filters |
|
|
|
Not available |
| Export references | Export to CSV, RIS, BibTeX |
(Plus users only) Export to CSV, RIS, BibTeX |
Export as CSV Cite as APA, etc. BibTeX | Export to CSV, RIS, BibTeX, Plain text |
| Save chat history | Auto save | Auto save | Need to save search and retrieve | Not available |
(updated 24 Apr 2024)
References:
An "unofficial" leaderboard compares available LLMs based on their performance on user voting, grading model responses to challenging questions, and measuring multitask accuracy.
As of 2 May 2024, the Top 10 are:
